[BioPython] Updating the tutorial, was :Parsing and Creating Dictionaries of GenBank files

Bill Barnard bill at barnard-engineering.com
Fri Apr 28 04:44:28 UTC 2006


On Fri, 2006-04-21 at 12:26 -0400, Michiel De Hoon wrote:
> > Something funny seems to have happened to the plain text version:
> > 
> >
> http://cvs.biopython.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs/viewcvs.cgi/biopython/Doc/Tutorial.t
> xt.diff?r1=1.5&r2=1.6&cvsroot=biopython
> 
> The plain text version is generated by hevea, so not by tex directly. The
> funny output is likely due to having a different hevea version (which I ran a
> couple of times). I didn't see anything obviously wrong with the Tutorial.tex
> source file, so I think these errors are due to errors in the Tutorial.tex ->
> Tutorial.txt translation by hevea.

FWIW - I just updated from CVS and ran my updated Doc makefiles (see
http://bugzilla.open-bio.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1939 ) and don't see any of
the weird artifacts in the generated Tutorial.txt file. My hevea version
is 1.06.

> 
> > If generating a consistent plain text version is a lot of hassle, then 
> > maybe we can live without it?
> 
> Currently, the plain text version is not very useful. It's not a source file,
> so it should not be in CVS. On the other hand, the plain text version is not
> available from the Biopython documentation page, and users are better off
> with the PDF version anyway. So I think nobody will miss the plain text
> version. Correct me if I'm wrong.

As long as your release process includes running a make in the Doc tree,
then you can generate the txt file from the tex source.

Bill



More information about the Biopython mailing list