[BioSQL-l] imminent release

[Chris Fields]

Fantastic news!  I think having a 1.0 release ands some docs would  
help tremendously.

As for any fixes at the hackathon: there are a number of bioperl-db- 
related bugs in Bugzilla that would be nice to get fixed, but I think  
a BioSQL 1.0 release is more important.

chris

On Feb 11, 2008, at 7:56 PM, Hilmar Lapp wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I am at the BioHackathon 2008 in Japan and Heikki (who is here too,  
> and so are Mark, Richard, and Jan Christian) reminds me that BioSQL  
> still isn't released and that the hackathon would present a nice  
> opportunity to correct that.
>
> So I intend to push out a release during the next 4 days, and as  
> soon as possible within these. Let me know if you feel that any  
> specific outstanding issue should be addressed before a release.
>
> I was going to call the release 1.0. Let me know if you find that  
> premature and what should be fixed before we can call it that.
>
> We expect in fact some Bio* interoperability documentation to come  
> out of the hackathon. This would then be released in a 1.0.x series.
>
> Schema updates would be incorporated into a 1.1.x or higher series.  
> My vote is to leave the PhyloDB module out of the 1.0 release, it is  
> simply still in flux (and in fact we might make some changes to it  
> here).
>
> Cheers,
>
> 	-hilmar
>
> -- 
> ===========================================================
> : Hilmar Lapp  -:-  Durham, NC  -:-  hlapp at gmx dot net :
> ===========================================================
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> BioSQL-l mailing list
> BioSQL-l at lists.open-bio.org
> http://lists.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/biosql-l

Christopher Fields
Postdoctoral Researcher
Lab of Dr. Robert Switzer
Dept of Biochemistry
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign