[BioRuby] Restyling BioRuby.org

[Raoul Bonnal]

Actually no need, may be .... What about a kind of logo with: BioRuby
boosted by FFI, that could be interesting for CS which can incorporate their
algorithm written in C/C++ (whatever language) into Ruby.

BioRuby developers could be ³redirected² to biogems.info/tutorial or
incorporate it into the site. If I remember correctly Jan wrote guide lines
on howto use git for developing bioruby, that kind of docs could be used as
inspiration for the new docs.

http://saaientist.blogspot.com/2008/06/bioruby-with-git-how-would-that-work.
html
http://nsaunders.wordpress.com/2011/08/05/bioruby-development-feedback-on-us
ing-git/
http://lists.open-bio.org/pipermail/bioruby/2008-September/000700.html


On 23/02/12 18.28, "Marjan Povolni" <marian.povolny at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> Looking at the "Audience" section on
> the http://bioruby.open-bio.org/wiki/Bioruby_site_Re-styling page, is there a
> real need for a separate treatment of Computer Science and Ruby background?
> 
> 
>  What different paths would those two groups go to get into bioinformatics
> using BioRuby? Except for learning Ruby frirst :)
> 
> And also, I think there is one category of audience missing: BioRuby
> developers :)
> 
> --
> Marjan Povolni
> 
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 3:50 PM, Raoul Bonnal <bonnal at ingm.org> wrote:
>> George have summarised some of the points raised during irc meeting:
>> here at http://bioruby.open-bio.org/wiki/Bioruby_site_Re-styling
>> 
>> About :" support example code snippets that can be run from the browser
>> * it would be great if we had a set of tutorials that users can follow in
>> the browser"
>> A starting point is http://bioruby.open-bio.org/wiki/BioRubyOnRails,  I
>> think Katayama did it.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> BioRuby Project - http://www.bioruby.org/
>> BioRuby mailing list
>> BioRuby at lists.open-bio.org
>> http://lists.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/bioruby
> 
>