[BioPython] Promotional Ads
Chris Dagdigian
dag@sonsorol.org
Tue, 22 Oct 2002 13:28:20 -0400
These complaints should have been sent to the OBF sysadmin team
(root-l@bioperl.org) so we could have responded. I can't subsribe to
every one of our 35+ lists you know :)
I've set up more restrictive anti-spam rules within Mailman for both the
bioperl and biojava mailing lists. The lists still allow outsiders to
post but we hold-for-moderation all emails that are not mime-encoded as
text/plain and any emails that include attachments. This works very well
but places an administrative burden on our volunteer mailing list
moderators.
The BioMoby list has taken this even futher-- they have elected to close
the list to outside posters -- all posts from non-members are held for
moderation and the moby list members have stepped forward to handle the
moderation tasks.
We also subscribe on a server level to the http:///mail-abuse.org RBL+
blackhole list which allows us to refuse inbound SMTP connections from
IP addresses of known spammers or open relays. Sadly this filter has not
worked since we changed IP addresses a few weeks ago. We have an open
ticket in with mail-abuse.org to update their databse with our new IP.
So- please discuss amongst yourselves what additional steps you'd like
to take. I'd recommend trying to block all attachments and non-plaintext
emails before taking the more drastic step of taking the list private.
It would also help greatly if there were a member or two on this list
who would volunteer to join our mailteam to help with the increased
moderation duties.
Regarding jitterbug -- you can elect to disable the email-based bug
reporting or you can switch to Bugzilla as bioperl did. In fact I think
Jeff has already set up bugzilla for biopython?
Regards,
Chris
Open-Bio.org
Danny Yoo wrote:
>On 22 Oct 2002, David A. Jewell wrote:
>
>
>
>>Dr. Singh sentiments are my own and I would very much appreciate efforts
>>in securing the Bio-python server from what appears to be frequent
>>hacks.
>>
>>
>
>
>How about if the biopython lists are restricted so that only subscribers
>can post? This is the approach that many other Mailman mailing lists have
>taken to prevent junk mail from flooding the list.
>
>It's also extraordinarily disheartening when there's more spam than actual
>bug reports in Jitterbug; I personally almost despise getting mail from
>biopython-dev simply because it's spam for the most part!
>
>
>The mailing lists on mail.python.org also have a spam filter that seems to
>be fairly effective. Someone may want to contact the mail.python.org
>administrator and see if a similar system can be set up for Biopython.org.
>
>