[Bioperl-l] Problems with Bioperl-ext package on WinVista?

[Chris Fields]

Take that back.  Yes the 'FL' warning is still there, but no tests are  
run b/c (simply put) there are no regression tests (no use of Test or  
Test::More).  If you run './Build test --verbose' you can see the run,  
but no test output.  That should be easy to fix, though.

chris

On Aug 17, 2009, at 4:22 PM, Chris Fields wrote:

> Still seeing that odd warning popping up:
>
> cjfields4:Bio-Tools-HMM cjfields$ ./Build test --verbose
> t/001_basics.t .. Argument "FL" isn't numeric in numeric lt (<) at / 
> Users/cjfields/bioperl/Bio-Tools-HMM/blib/lib/Bio/Tools/HMM.pm line  
> 185.
>
> Have you tried using Yee Man's original Makefile.PL to see if it  
> works better?  There appear to be some differences in the  
> compilation, including a linking warning popping up.
>
> chris
>
> On Aug 17, 2009, at 3:32 PM, Robert Buels wrote:
>
>> OK, I split Bio::Tools::HMM and Bio::Ext::HMM off into a new distro  
>> at Bio-Tools-HMM in the repo.  The tests are not passing, I think  
>> that some bugs need to be fixed in the logic of things.
>>
>> Yee Man, could you have a look?  To download the newly repackaged  
>> code:
>>
>> svn co svn+ssh://your_login@dev.open-bio.org/home/svn-repositories/ 
>> bioperl/Bio-Tools-HMM/trunk Bio-Tools-HMM
>>
>> perl Build.PL; ./Build test
>>
>> Please check that things are compiling OK, check the test logic,  
>> upgrade the tests to use Test::More, and get the tests to the point  
>> where they are passing.
>>
>> At that point, it should be ready for CPAN, but we need to decide  
>> how we want to coordinate that with releases of bioperl-live and  
>> bioperl-ext.
>>
>> Rob
>> _______________________________________________
>> Bioperl-l mailing list
>> Bioperl-l at lists.open-bio.org
>> http://lists.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/bioperl-l
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bioperl-l mailing list
> Bioperl-l at lists.open-bio.org
> http://lists.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/bioperl-l