[Bioperl-l] Regarding Bio::Root::Build
Chris Fields
cjfields at illinois.edu
Sun Aug 9 13:34:07 UTC 2009
On Aug 9, 2009, at 8:15 AM, Sendu Bala wrote:
> Chris Fields wrote:
>> On Aug 9, 2009, at 5:38 AM, Sendu Bala wrote:
>>> The easiest, cleanest and most standard solution is to create a
>>> lib directory and svn move Bio into it. Does anyone have an
>>> objection to me doing this for the network, db and run packages?
>>> It will only affect developers currently working on code in those
>>> packages, and they just need to be aware that an svn update will
>>> be rather dramatic after my change.
>>
>> From what I have seen (with my few tests) everything (modules,
>> scripts) gets copied into blib just fine and the temp folder for
>> script generation gets cleaned up; I haven't progressed beyond to
>> the installation step, but there isn't anything to me that
>> indicates it wouldn't work.
>
> ./Build testinstall will show you it doesn't work as-is.
Sorry, I'll be leaving in the next hour, but for the above, did you
mean './Build fakeinstall'?
As long as you're moving everything into /lib (which I fully support),
we should consider hard_coding scripts into bp_foo.PLS syntax seeing
as we're going through additional trouble of converting them over.
That is, unless there is a specific purpose to keeping them without
the 'bp_'.
chris
More information about the Bioperl-l
mailing list