[Biojava-dev] RE: [Biojava-l] BLAST Parser in Anger!

Schreiber, Mark mark.schreiber at agresearch.co.nz
Wed Jan 29 11:08:05 EST 2003


Hi -

The only changes I know of are adding accessors to the interface (or a
subinterface if you really want to avoid breakage).

As for time, not sure. I'm not very familiar with the internals of the
blast parsing API. I suppose as long as the SAXAdapter can produce
everything in the BlastLikeDataSetCollection.dtd, It would be great to
have methods to access all the info that the dtd supports.

- Mark

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thomas Down [mailto:td2 at sanger.ac.uk] 
> Sent: Tuesday, 28 January 2003 11:07 p.m.
> To: Schreiber, Mark
> Cc: biojava-dev at biojava.org
> Subject: Re: [Biojava-l] BLAST Parser in Anger!
> 
> 
> On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 09:24:05AM +1300, Schreiber, Mark wrote:
> > Hi -
> > 
> > There are some deficiencies in the blast parsing API. I know that 
> > there is some reluctance to add new methods to the 
> interface as things 
> > will break, however blast parsing is a core task and it would be v 
> > good if we could make this more functional. One way to get 
> around the 
> > interface thing is to simlply extend it and then make all 
> the classes 
> > we have now implement the extended interface.
> > 
> > Another way is to simply break the interface before bj1.3 
> is released 
> > and make it stable from there on.
> > 
> > Can we please, please sort this out before bj1.3 is 
> released? Perhaps 
> > the development team could get together over a beer at the 
> hackathon 
> > and nut this one out. It really can't be that hard can it?
> 
> Am I right in thinking that this is just going to be adding 
> accessors to the interfaces?  That's actually a relatively 
> low-risk change, especially since I don't think there are any 
> implementations of those interfaces outside the biojava-live 
> tree (someone please correct me if I'm wrong here).  If it 
> meant removing methods or changing their contracts, that's 
> quite a different thing.
> 
> How long do you think this would take to do?
> 
>      Thomas.
> 
=======================================================================
Attention: The information contained in this message and/or attachments
from AgResearch Limited is intended only for the persons or entities
to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged
material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or
taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or
entities other than the intended recipients is prohibited by AgResearch
Limited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the
sender immediately.
=======================================================================



More information about the biojava-dev mailing list