[BioPython] Plans for release 0.95d01

[Cayte]

----- Original Message -----
From: "Jeffrey Chang" <jchang@SMI.Stanford.EDU>
To: "Cayte" <katel@worldpath.net>
Cc: <biopython@biopython.org>
Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2001 2:42 PM
Subject: Re: [BioPython] Plans for release 0.95d01


> Sounds good.  I've gotten a few requests to hold the reigns back a bit, so
> we'll shoot for a release at the end of the month.
>
> Things to do/confirm before then:
>
> - Dependency checking in setup.py is done?
>
>
> - finish UniGene

   I think its ready.  I checked the output quickly , but I plan to do the
character by character, till-your-eyes-get-blurry checking over the weekend.
And clean up Gobase and Rebase.  Sometime I should redo these programs
because I've learned more about sgmllib and I could do a better job.  But
not for this release.
>
> - make sure we pass all regression tests.

I need to commit the regression test  + its input and output.
>
>
>
                     Cayte
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, 5 Feb 2001, Cayte wrote:
>
> >   With more test cases I found more bugs in UniGene.py.  I started in a
> > panic, but I cleaned up the output and changed the names to something
more
> > descriptive.  Then solutions started to pop out.
> >
> >   I could use another week.  I have a bug left that occurs when a key is
> > repeated.  Now it discards all but one value, but I'd lie to combine the
> > values in a list.  Plus Rebase and Gobase.
> >
> >  HTML is heavily recursive.  Lisp may be a good candidate because it is
> > oriented to recursion.
> >
> >  BTW, python 2.1 is on the way.
> >
> >                                                Cayte
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > BioPython mailing list  -  BioPython@biopython.org
> > http://biopython.org/mailman/listinfo/biopython
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> BioPython mailing list  -  BioPython@biopython.org
> http://biopython.org/mailman/listinfo/biopython
>
>