[Bioperl-pipeline] WAITFORANOTHER is needed?

Sang Chul Choi goshng at hanafos.com
Wed Apr 16 10:26:43 EDT 2003


Dear Stupka!

Sorry, I made a mistake in terms of biopipe. I created but two jobs, not two analyses.

Sincerely yours,

Sang Chul Choi

> > I was fool. For Anaysis 1, I had inserted a new Rule, WAITFORANOTHER.
> > In Analysis 1, I have two analyses and don't know which analysis 
> > firstly
> > will end. So, I let one analysis wait for another, then continue 
> > Analysis 2.
> 
> That is a valid point, you are not a fool, we have WAIT_FOR_ALL to wait 
> for multiple (all) jobs from one analysis to be finished, but we 
> currently don't allow waiting for multiple analyses, which should be 
> allowed. How did you solve it? Did you hardcode the id of the other 
> analysis?
> 
> Interesting...
> 
> Elia
> 
> ---
> Bioinformatics Program Manager
> Temasek Life Sciences Laboratory
> 1, Research Link
> Singapore 117604
> Tel. +65 6874 4945
> Fax. +65 6872 7007
> 
> 



More information about the bioperl-pipeline mailing list