[Open-bio-l] [GSoC-mentors] OBF Proposals

[Mark A. Jensen]

Rob, Chris -- do we have a protocol in place for scoring/evaluation?

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Robert Buels [mailto:rmb32 at cornell.edu]
>Sent: Wednesday, April 7, 2010 01:09 PM
>To: 'GSoC - mentors only'
>Cc: open-bio-l at lists.open-bio.org
>Subject: Re: [GSoC-mentors] OBF Proposals
>
>Based on the discussions on the GSoC-wide mentors list, the difficulty 
>with starting to review proposals before the deadline is that it can 
>introduce bias toward lower scores for proposals submitted at or near 
>the deadline.  Also, some of these proposals might still be edited by 
>students.
>
>However, I think it would be a good idea for mentors to start taking a 
>look *through* the proposals, just don't really score them yet.
>
>Rob
>
>
>Chris Fields wrote:
>> All mentors, 
>> 
>> We really need to start evaluating the proposals listed on the OBF site; a vast majority are still listed under new proposals (i.e. not under review).  This doesn't need to include assigning some score just yet, though I have noticed a few orgs (TPF, NESCent) are doing so.  
>> 
>> http://socghop.appspot.com/gsoc/org/list_proposals/google/gsoc2010/obf
>> 
>> chris
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Gsoc-mentors mailing list
>> Gsoc-mentors at lists.open-bio.org
>> http://lists.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/gsoc-mentors
>> 
>
>_______________________________________________
>Gsoc-mentors mailing list
>Gsoc-mentors at lists.open-bio.org
>http://lists.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/gsoc-mentors
>