[EMBOSS] Support for multi-line annotation in ig format

[Peter Rice]

On 19/09/2012 11:58, Peter Cock wrote:
> Does it need a new format name? EMBOSS already defines "ig" and
> "igstrict" - do the USPTO files diverge from these?

The format name is needed as an option to dbxflat -idformat so we can 
select a specific parser for any additional fields.

For example, in dbxfasta -idformat has 7 names for 'fasta' format.

regards,

Peter Rice
EMBOSS Team