[EMBOSS] strange frames
Stefan Rensing
stefan.rensing at biologie.uni-freiburg.de
Wed May 17 08:16:35 EDT 2006
Dear all,
apparently, sixpack/transeq handle frames on the reverse complementary
strand different than e.g. BLAST does (and different than I would have
expected).
Using sixpack/transeq to translate this sequence:
AGATGACTCCGTTGCAGTTGGCTACTGCTTATATTGCATCAGGGGGTGTGCTTCA
Sixpack output:
R * L R C S W L L L I L H Q G V C F X F1
D D S V A V G Y C L Y C I R G C A S F2
M T P L Q L A T A Y I A S G G V L F3
1 AGATGACTCCGTTGCAGTTGGCTACTGCTTATATTGCATCAGGGGGTGTGCTTCA 55
----:----|----:----|----:----|----:----|----:----|----:----|
1 TCTACTGAGGCAACGTCAACCGATGACGAATATAACGTAGTCCCCCACACGAAGT 55
L H S R Q L Q S S S I N C * P T H K F6
X I V G N C N A V A * I A D P P T S * F5
S S E T A T P * Q K Y Q M L P H A E F4
Transeq output:
Frame -2:
>>test_4
EAHPLMQYKQ*PTATESS
Frame -1:
>>test_5
*STPPDAI*AVANCNGVIX
Frame -3:
>>test_6
KHTP*CNISSSQLQRSHL
IMHO, it should be:
Frame 1 = +1
Frame 2 = +2
Frame 3 = +3
Frame 4 = -1
Frame 5 = -2
Frame 6 = -3
However, in this case, sixpack and transeq return:
Frame 1 = +1
Frame 2 = +2
Frame 3 = +3
Frame 4 = -2
Frame 5 = -1
Frame 6 = -3
Is this the expected behaviour, and if so, why?
Regards,
Stefan
--
Dr. Stefan Rensing, Group Leader Computational Biology
Plant Biotechnology, Faculty of Biology, University of Freiburg
Schaenzlestr. 1, D-79104 Freiburg, Fon: +49 761 203-6974, Fax: -6945
http://www.plant-biotech.net/ http://www.cosmoss.org/
stefan.rensing at biologie.uni-freiburg.de
"Mr. Musgrave, please don't interrupt me when I'm asking rhetorical
questions."
More information about the EMBOSS
mailing list