On Wed, 8 Mar 2000, Ewan Birney wrote: > > My bit looks OK to me. > > Do you want to take on the forwards-backwards then? Doh! Ok ;) The naive (quadratic space) version at least -- it shouldn't be too bad once the naive Viterbi is written.. > > I know. It rocks. It walks on water. etc. etc. > OK OK I take the point I'll shut up about the STL...