[BioSQL-l] more consistency

[Hilmar Lapp]

Both are OK with me. These are all legacy names.

Note, however, that a term should live in an ontology for the sake of a 
consistent unique key. If it's not a NOT NULL column already, I suggest 
to make the foreign key from Ontology_Term to Ontology mandatory.

	-hilmar

On Tuesday, March 11, 2003, at 12:49  PM, Aaron J Mackey wrote:

>
> I notice that a dbxref for an ontology term is in ontology_dbxref, not
> ontology_term_dbxref (I'd think that ontology_dbxref was a dbxref for 
> the
> ontology, not terms in the ontology).
>
> Proposal: ontology_dbxref renamed to ontology_term_dbxref
>
> Alternative proposal: ontology_term be replaced with term (which is a 
> more
> generic concept, that may or may not be involved in an ontology).
>
> -Aaron
>
> -- 
>  Aaron J Mackey
>  Pearson Laboratory
>  University of Virginia
>  (434) 924-2821
>  amackey at virginia.edu
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> BioSQL-l mailing list
> BioSQL-l at open-bio.org
> http://open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/biosql-l
>
-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------
Hilmar Lapp                            email: lapp at gnf.org
GNF, San Diego, Ca. 92121              phone: +1-858-812-1757
-------------------------------------------------------------