[BioSQL-l] rename seqfeature_location to location?

[Hilmar Lapp]

I second this motion :-) even though I don't have strong feelings about 
it. If no-one speaks up against it it's going to be implemented.

Note that it would also potentially be more compatible with future 
redesigns of the feature-annotation-location object model, as Aaron 
hints.

	-hilmar

On Tuesday, March 11, 2003, at 12:14  PM, Aaron J Mackey wrote:

>
> In going over the schema again (and wrapping myself in seqfeature 
> logic),
> I notice that we call location's seqfeature_locations (although when we
> have qualifier values on locations, we simply call them
> location_qualifier_values).  Is there any objection to shortening
> "seqfeature_location" to simply "location" (which would also be more
> consistent with the rest of the naming scheme)?
>
> -Aaron
>
> -- 
>  Aaron J Mackey
>  Pearson Laboratory
>  University of Virginia
>  (434) 924-2821
>  amackey at virginia.edu
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> BioSQL-l mailing list
> BioSQL-l at open-bio.org
> http://open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/biosql-l
>
-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------
Hilmar Lapp                            email: lapp at gnf.org
GNF, San Diego, Ca. 92121              phone: +1-858-812-1757
-------------------------------------------------------------