[BioSQL-l] Can I just consider import HGI.101403 to biosequence
table?
Hilmar Lapp
hlapp at gnf.org
Wed Dec 17 13:01:21 EST 2003
On Wednesday, December 17, 2003, at 09:26 AM, Josh Lauricha wrote:
> On a side note, is there anything thats more efficient at getting a
> sequence from BioSQL than Bio::DB::BioDB? All the transformations done
> by that interface make it too slow to use on a webpage.
>
Not for perl AFAIK. What is the response time that you're looking for?
What is the search that you execute?
A single sequence record located by unique key should return in a
fraction of a second that's shorter than the browser page build-up
combined with the network latency, provided you back it with a decent
database server.
Note that the bioperl-db code makes extensive use of caching. If you
fire up a CGI each and every time you hit the page, you won't take any
advantage of that.
-hilmar
--
-------------------------------------------------------------
Hilmar Lapp email: lapp at gnf.org
GNF, San Diego, Ca. 92121 phone: +1-858-812-1757
-------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the BioSQL-l
mailing list