[BioRuby] Developing a VISION

[Rob Syme]

Very nice.
Does this make the open-bio testing apparatus redundant (for our purposes)?
-r
On Feb 27, 2012 6:33 PM, "Pjotr Prins" <pjotr.public14 at thebird.nl> wrote:

> Excellent idea.
>
> On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 11:19:26AM +0100, Raoul Bonnal wrote:
> > Cool Pjotr, I could add this feature/tempalte to biogem I'll open an
> > issue/request
> >
> >
> > On 27/02/12 10.55, "Pjotr Prins" <pjotr.public14 at thebird.nl> wrote:
> >
> > > Continuous integration testing is very useful for biogems/plugins. The
> > > Ruby community has come up with travis-ci, which is integrated into
> > > github! Any time code is submitted to github, the automated testing on
> > > different platforms kicks in.
> > >
> > > Here we set out to set up travis-ci with a biogem. I chose my bio-gff3
> > > gem for integrated testing. See
> > >
> > >
> https://github.com/pjotrp/bioruby-gem/blob/master/doc/integration-testing.md
> > >
> > > On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 10:16:21AM +0100, Raoul Bonnal wrote:
> > >> +1
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On 25/02/12 09.42, "Pjotr Prins" <pjotr.public14 at thebird.nl> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> ## Vision statement: BioRuby is agile
> > >>>
> > >>> The Ruby community is always working on agile processes. BioRuby can
> > >>> benefit from behaviour driven development (BDD), specifications,
> > >>> doctests and integration and unit testing.
> > >>>
> > >>> Realisation:
> > >>>
> > >>> In addition to unit testing we should concentrate on introducing
> > >>> Rspec, Cucumber, rubydoctests across the board. Also we should use
> the
> > >>> continuous integration testing by services such as travis-ci (I have
> a
> > >>> writeup on the latter soon) and perhaps use the OBF test services for
> > >>> stable plugins.
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> BioRuby Project - http://www.bioruby.org/
> BioRuby mailing list
> BioRuby at lists.open-bio.org
> http://lists.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/bioruby
>