[BioRuby] Broken link on wiki installation page

[Fields, Christopher J]

Ah, see the buildbot system is up?  Methinks we need to set up bioperl...

chris

On Sep 21, 2011, at 11:16 AM, Pjotr Prins wrote:

> Hi Peter,
> 
> You should look into rvm. I tried avoiding using rvm - but now I do.
> I gave in.  rvm should work in user land.
> 
> Are you also planning to add testing for other biogems? At least
> bio-core and bio-core-ext (which include the 'core' gems). It would be
> really nice to have broader coverage.
> 
> Pj.
> 
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 05:04:35PM +0100, Peter Cock wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 4:56 PM, Naohisa GOTO
>> <ngoto at gen-info.osaka-u.ac.jp> wrote:
>>> Hi Peter,
>>> 
>>> Thank you. I've changed the link.
>>> The URL is changed due to the RDoc renderer's version up.
>>> 
>>> Naohisa Goto
>> 
>> Great.
>> 
>> I see you require currently require Ruby 1.8.6 or later (except Ruby 1.9.0)
>> 
>> I'm thinking about potential build slaves for nightly testing
>> (something Raoul and I chatted about the BioHackathon).
>> 
>> That means my Mac OS X 10.6.8 Snow Leopard with Ruby 1.8.7 should be fine.
>> 
>> On the other hand, one of our CentOS servers which use as a Biopython
>> buildslave only has Ruby 1.8.5, so that won't work without me
>> installing a more recent version of ruby under the user account.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> 
>> Peter
>> _______________________________________________
>> BioRuby Project - http://www.bioruby.org/
>> BioRuby mailing list
>> BioRuby at lists.open-bio.org
>> http://lists.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/bioruby
>> 
> _______________________________________________
> BioRuby Project - http://www.bioruby.org/
> BioRuby mailing list
> BioRuby at lists.open-bio.org
> http://lists.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/bioruby