[BioRuby] Subversion

[Moses M. Hohman]

+1

I've used cvs2svn a couple times, and it works very smoothly,  
shouldn't take more than an hour of effort (15 minutes if you're lucky).

Cool to see all the activity on this mailing list, I hadn't looked  
for a while!

Moses

On Apr 6, 2007, at 7:50 AM, Sohel Merchant wrote:

> I vote for keeping the history. And cvs2svn is works nicely.
>
> Sohel.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: bioruby-bounces at lists.open-bio.org
> [mailto:bioruby-bounces at lists.open-bio.org] On Behalf Of Trevor  
> Wennblom
> Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2007 6:49 PM
> To: bioruby at lists.open-bio.org
> Subject: [BioRuby] Subversion
>
> So what do people want as far as migrating the history from the soon-
> to-be-old CVS repository to the Subversion repository?
>
> My thoughts on this are that we can lock the CVS repository and keep
> it around for reading if we want to look up who did what in the  
> future.
>
> So far the votes are:
>    Start fresh - me
>    Migrate the history - Pjotr
>
> Any other voters?  I'm trying to set this up to coincide with the
> release of 1.1.  If you're a core member and don't care either way
> just respond "no vote" or something so I know I'm not leaving anyone
> out here.
>
> Trevor
> _______________________________________________
> BioRuby mailing list
> BioRuby at lists.open-bio.org
> http://lists.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/bioruby
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> BioRuby mailing list
> BioRuby at lists.open-bio.org
> http://lists.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/bioruby
>