[Biopython] Problem writing a PDB with multiple models

[Claudia Millán Nebot]

Sorry, I meant the END statement :)

2015-10-27 16:37 GMT+00:00 João Rodrigues <j.p.g.l.m.rodrigues at gmail.com>:

> Hi Claudia,
>
> The TER statement *should* show up at the end of each chain, so it’s OK.
>
> Best,
>
> João
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 3:40 PM, Claudia Millán Nebot <cmncri at ibmb.csic.es
> > wrote:
>
>> Dear Hongbo and João,
>>
>> thank you both! I got my models named right now, but as João points out,
>> the TER keeps appearing.
>> Anyway, I am happy that it is something that can be helpful for other
>> cases because it is a general problem in the writing of
>> the file. I will updgrade my Biopython installation as soon as the fix is
>> available. Thanks again! :)
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Claudia
>>
>> 2015-10-27 13:40 GMT+00:00 Hongbo Zhu 朱宏博 <macrozhu at gmail.com>:
>>
>>> if you look at PDBIO.py :
>>>
>>> if model_flag:
>>>     fp.write("MODEL      %s\n" % model.serial_num)
>>> ​
>>> so model.serial_num is written, not model.id.
>>>
>>> Although the BioPython FAQ says:
>>>
>>> What is a model id?
>>>
>>> The model id is an integer which denotes the rank of the model in the
>>> PDB/mmCIF file. The model is starts at 0. Crystal structures generally have
>>> only one model (with id 0), while NMR files usually have several models.
>>>
>>>
>>> So perhaps one of them should be updated?
>>>
>>> hongbo
>>>
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.open-bio.org/pipermail/biopython/attachments/20151027/28d829af/attachment.html>