[BioPython] one function, two behaivors
Peter
biopython at maubp.freeserve.co.uk
Sat Jun 28 11:23:40 EDT 2008
I wrote,
> As to why there are two ways, well, frankly the Bio.Transcribe and
> Bio.Translate code isn't very nice to use! The Bio.Seq functions are
> much simpler.
Hmm - the tutorial is still using Bio.Transcribe and Bio.Translate at
the moment. I could update the tutorial to use the Bio.Seq functions
for (back)transcription. However, as I said in the last email,
Bio.Translate still has its uses - there is no way to do a "translate
to stop" with Bio.Seq for example.
Maybe Bug 2381 should be a priority for the next release AFTER the
imminent Biopython 1.46. We can then use object methods in the
tutorial, which I personally would find much nicer to use.
http://bugzilla.open-bio.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2381
If you could have a look at the suggested changes on Bug 2381, I'd
welcome some feedback.
Peter
More information about the BioPython
mailing list