[BioPython] Re: sequence class
Iddo Friedberg
idoerg@cc.huji.ac.il
Wed, 12 Jan 2000 11:48:29 +0200 (GMT+0200)
On Tue, 11 Jan 2000, Cayte wrote:
: In the Seq object by Andrew Dalke and Itto Friedberg. I was wondering,
: why does the _call_ return a list of letters instead of a string?I imagine
: most users would want text?
:
Actually, I meant for it to return a sequence object, which also includes
the sequence as a list of characters. I hold that a mutable data type for
the sequence is better, for reasons of easy sequence manipulations using
fundamental Python tools. Andrew suggested that a string should be
better, for reasons of string immutability, memory efficiency, and
reduction of fundamental data types.
This is further elaborated upon in the Oct 1999 discussions, under the
"[BioPython] Sequence numbering. Moving on..." headers.
http://www.biopython.org/pipermail/biopython/
Cheers,
Iddo
--
/* --- */main(c){float t,x,y,b=-2,a=b;for(;b-=a>2?.1/(a=-2):0,b<2;
/* | */putchar(30+c),a+=.0503) for(x=y=c=0;++c<90&x*x+y*y<4;y=2*
/* | */x*y+b,x=t)t=x*x-y*y+a;}
/* --- ddo Friedberg */