[BioPython] python vs. perl
Ewan Birney
birney@ebi.ac.uk
Thu, 17 Feb 2000 17:42:30 +0000 (GMT)
On Thu, 17 Feb 2000, J.W. Bizzaro wrote:
> There is an interesting article and discussion about this scripting language
> war. Here is a comment posted by a (former) Perl programmer:
>
> ---------------------------------------
> It's sort of like a really clean C++ with the convenience of Perl.
>
> I would HIGHLY recommend Python as being something you need to learn and start
> using! I mean, Perl is good for hacking stuff together because you know how to
> do it in Perl. Even Bash is good for that.. But Python really gives you a good
> feeling that you are architecting something that is made to work, made to
> last, and made to be maintainable. And Python is extremely good for quick
> Perl-ish hack jobs.
I agree completely ;) (and I am coordinating bioperl!). But
Perl is ultimately portable
has an incredible set of extensions - CPAN
and the killer
95% of bioinformaticians use Perl
But I honestly believe the future is jpython/java objects on the server,
python/jpython/possibly perl on the scripting/driving side. Hence the
biocorba stuff.
>
> Maybe Perl (in reference to an above post) is for artists, but I think Python
> is for designers. Know which one you are, before you do anything else.
> ----------------------------------------
>
> http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=00/02/16/1729227&mode=flat
>
> Cheers.
> Jeff
> --
> +----------------------------------+
> | J.W. Bizzaro |
> | |
> | http://bioinformatics.org/~jeff/ |
> | |
> | BIOINFORMATICS.ORG |
> | The Open Lab |
> | |
> | http://bioinformatics.org/ |
> +----------------------------------+
>
> _______________________________________________
> BioPython mailing list - BioPython@biopython.org
> http://biopython.org/mailman/listinfo/biopython
>