[Biopython-dev] Quantifiedcode now has cody
Peter Cock
p.j.a.cock at googlemail.com
Mon Dec 7 12:05:15 UTC 2015
Hi all,
Here's the first suggestion from "Cody" at Quantified Code which
we had to reject due to it breaking under Python 2.6,
https://github.com/biopython/biopython/pull/711
Here's the first suggestion from "Cody" at Quantified Code which
I think is useful and ready to merge/cherry-pick:
https://github.com/biopython/biopython/pull/710
If anyone has code comments, please comment on GitHub.
If anyone has any objections to us using the Cody / Quantified Code
contribution please speak up now. e.g. What implications might this
have for the proposed re-licensing of Biopython to use the 3-clause
BSD licence? i.e. Who owns the copyright of these changes.
As an aside, Cody works by creating branches (named autofix...)
under the main Biopython repository - they can be deleted after a
change is rejected or merged. This is noteworthy as until now
we've just had the one "master" branch on this repository.
Regards,
Peter
On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 5:20 PM, Peter Cock <p.j.a.cock at googlemail.com> wrote:
> We can try it, sure - although I anticipate some of its suggestions
> would have to be declined while we still support Python 2.6 and 2.7.
>
> Peter
>
> On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 5:11 PM, Tiago Rodrigues Antao <tra at popgen.net> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> This seems interesting:
>>
>> https://www.quantifiedcode.com/cody
>>
>> [Automated corrections via github pull requests]
>>
>> If no one opposes I would try to set up automated pull requests just
>> to test this...
>>
>> Tiago
>> _______________________________________________
>> Biopython-dev mailing list
>> Biopython-dev at mailman.open-bio.org
>> http://mailman.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/biopython-dev
More information about the Biopython-dev
mailing list