[Biopython-dev] Adding a CONTRIBUTING.rst file for GitHub?

[Fields, Christopher J]

Funny you bring this up; we’ve had a doc somewhere regarding how to get involved and contribute to BioPerl, but I think it’s wiki so not optimal.  We're working (slowly) on moving docs back to the code repos for readthedocs to tie them to their respective code releases, the contributing docs would be good one to include.  Now just need to dig them up...

chris

On Apr 2, 2015, at 4:51 AM, João Rodrigues <j.p.g.l.m.rodrigues at gmail.com<mailto:j.p.g.l.m.rodrigues at gmail.com>> wrote:

Better under version control indeed.

Em qui, 2 de abr de 2015 às 11:51, Peter Cock <p.j.a.cock at googlemail.com<mailto:p.j.a.cock at googlemail.com>> escreveu:
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 10:45 AM, João Rodrigues
<j.p.g.l.m.rodrigues at gmail.com<mailto:j.p.g.l.m.rodrigues at gmail.com>> wrote:
> I didn't have much time to go deep into reStructured syntax... sorry about
> that!
>
> I'll make some more changes later today and tidy it up.

Don't worry about it - those were minor details really. The
overall content was far more important and you've done a
nice combine combining things.

> We can also just
> have the file pointing to the Contributing Wiki page actually and complete
> that one with some extra information. Right now we have the Tutorial chapter
> & the Wiki page and they differ a bit in content. We could merge them and
> just point to a single source.

Good point. Similar information in three places would be silly.
I personally would pick the new contributing file as the master?

Peter
_______________________________________________
Biopython-dev mailing list
Biopython-dev at mailman.open-bio.org<mailto:Biopython-dev at mailman.open-bio.org>
http://mailman.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/biopython-dev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.open-bio.org/pipermail/biopython-dev/attachments/20150402/8845dc5f/attachment.html>