[Biopython-dev] [GSoC] Gsoc 2014 aspirant
Harsh Beria
harsh.beria93 at gmail.com
Mon Mar 17 20:39:25 EDT 2014
Hi,
I have started to write a proposal for a project on pair wise sequence
alignment. Is there anyone interested in mentoring the project so that I
can discuss some of the algorithmic problems in detail? Also, do I need to
add the project to the ideas page as it is not there yet?
Thanks
On Mar 6, 2014 7:19 AM, "Michiel de Hoon" <mjldehoon at yahoo.com> wrote:
> Hi Nigel,
>
> While compiling Biopython on Windows can be tricky, in my experience it
> has been easy to compile the C libraries in Biopython on other platforms
> (Unix/Linux/MacOSX). Have you run into specific problems compiling
> Biopython? I would think that wrapping 3rd-party libraries or executables
> is much more error-prone.
>
> Best,
> -Michiel.
>
> --------------------------------------------
> On Tue, 3/4/14, Nigel Delaney <nigel.delaney at outlook.com> wrote:
>
> Subject: Re: [Biopython-dev] [GSoC] Gsoc 2014 aspirant
> To: "'Peter Cock'" <p.j.a.cock at googlemail.com>, "'Fields, Christopher
> J'" <cjfields at illinois.edu>
> Cc: biopython-dev at lists.open-bio.org, "'Harsh Beria'" <
> harsh.beria93 at gmail.com>
> Date: Tuesday, March 4, 2014, 5:39 PM
>
> As a quick $0.02 from a library user
> on this. Back in 2006 when I first
> started using biopython I was working with Bio.pairwise2,
> and learned that
> it was too slow for the task at hand, so wound up switching
> to
> passing/parsing files to an aligner on the command line to
> get around this,
> as (on windows back then), I never got the compiled C code
> to work properly.
> Although pypy may be fast enough and has been very
> impressive in my
> experience (plus computers are much faster now), I think
> wrapping a library
> that is cross platform and maintains its own binaries would
> be a great
> option rather than implementing C-code (I think this might
> be what the GSoC
> student did last year for BioPython by wrapping Python).
>
> Mostly though I just wanted to second Peter's wariness about
> adding C-code
> into the library. I have found over the years that a
> lot of python
> scientific tools that in theory should be cross platform
> (Stampy, IPython,
> Matplotlib, Numpy, GATK, etc.) are really not and can be a
> huge timesuck of
> dealing with installation issues as code moves between
> computers and
> operating systems, usually due to some C code or OS specific
> behavior.
> Since code in python works anywhere python is installed, I
> really appreciate
> the extent that the library can be as much pure python as
> allowable or
> strictly dependent on a particular downloadable binary for a
> specific
> OS/Architecture/Scenario.
> _______________________________________________
> Biopython-dev mailing list
> Biopython-dev at lists.open-bio.org
> http://lists.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/biopython-dev
>
>
More information about the Biopython-dev
mailing list