[Biopython-dev] Redmine issue 2727 ready for pull
Lenna Peterson
arklenna at gmail.com
Sat Aug 10 20:43:36 EDT 2013
Hi Morten,
I think this looks great. Why not submit a pull request?
Cheers,
Lenna
On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 4:33 AM, Morten Kjeldgaard <mok at bioxray.dk> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've finally gotten around to following up to a very old patch I sent to
> the redmine bug tracker [1]. The patch addresses the problem that Bio.PDB
> does not parse the important CRYST1 record. In the bug comments, Peter
> Cock asked to include the explanation of the new keys in the docstring.
> That has now been done.
>
> Peter also asks about the default values chosen (if the CRYST1 header is
> not present). These are probably universally chosen default values in
> various crystallographic programs, and these values are also used in PDB
> entries containinging NMR entries, for example.
>
> My github branch containing the patch #2727 is in [2]. I am using Bio.PDB
> quite a lot, and I would like to contribute more to it in the future.
>
> Cheers,
> Morten
>
>
> [1] https://redmine.open-bio.org/issues/2727
> [2] https://github.com/mok0/biopython/tree/pdbwork
> _______________________________________________
> Biopython-dev mailing list
> Biopython-dev at lists.open-bio.org
> http://lists.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/biopython-dev
>
More information about the Biopython-dev
mailing list