[Biopython-dev] Python's new DVCS chosen

[Bartek Wilczynski]

On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 1:27 PM, Peter <biopython at maubp.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 12:05 PM, Bartek Wilczynski
> <bartek at rezolwenta.eu.org> wrote:
>> I think we have made a consensus decision to try out git/github and I
>> think it's extremely counter-productive to re-open the discussion on
>> our choice now. I'm not a git fanboy, but because there are _no_
>> universal criteria to choose between git vs. bzr vs. Hg we should not
>> spend more time on this issue.
>
> I hadn't intended to reopen the debate - it was just a post for interests sake.
>
That's relieving. Maybe I'm becoming overly sensitive on the subject.

> As you can probably tell from looking at the biopython network graph
> on github (which I got to work on Linux but only with Adobe's flash
> plugin - gnash etc didn't seem to cope), I've been getting to grips
> with git (and github).
>
I haven't  checked for a while, but it seem's that we've got quite a number
 of people making changes on different branches. That's cool.

I'd like to encourage people to share their impressions of git+github
with others on  the list.
If there are any issues, it's better to discuss them early.

cheers
  Bartek