[Biopython-dev] [Bug 2677] BioSQL seqfeature enhancements

[bugzilla-daemon at portal.open-bio.org]

http://bugzilla.open-bio.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2677





------- Comment #9 from biopython-bugzilla at maubp.freeserve.co.uk  2008-11-28 15:10 EST -------
(In reply to comment #8)
> Yes, but if we record something in the location_qualifier_value table we can't
> use a NULL term_id (possibly a schema limitation).  We therefore need to use a
> particular ontology, which is where some co-ordination with the other BioSQL
> projects is needed (so that we all default to the same ontology).  I'd meant
> to send of an email about this to the BioSQL mailing list but didn't get it
> done before I had to leave for a trip.

I've started a discussion on the BioSQL mailing list, see this thread:
http://lists.open-bio.org/pipermail/biosql-l/2008-November/001412.html - me
http://lists.open-bio.org/pipermail/biosql-l/2008-November/001414.html -
Richard from BioJava
http://lists.open-bio.org/pipermail/biosql-l/2008-November/001413.html - me
etc.

Cymon - if you haven't already done so, I would encourage you to sign up to the
BioSQL mailing list.

Peter


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.open-bio.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.