[Biopython-dev] [Bug 2381] translate and transcribe methods for the Seq object (in Bio.Seq)
bugzilla-daemon at portal.open-bio.org
bugzilla-daemon at portal.open-bio.org
Thu Nov 27 04:57:00 EST 2008
http://bugzilla.open-bio.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2381
------- Comment #54 from lpritc at scri.sari.ac.uk 2008-11-27 04:56 EST -------
(In reply to comment #53)
> (In reply to comment #27)
> > Created an attachment (id=1032)
--> (http://bugzilla.open-bio.org/attachment.cgi?id=1032&action=view) [details] [details]
> > Patch to Bio/Seq.py to add start codon handling to translation
> >
> > Patch adds a new boolean argument to the translate method and function, called
> > "init" (rather than my earlier suggestions like "from_start" or "check_start"
> > which could be considered misleading).
[...]
> I don't like the "init" argument either. I would call it force_initiator_Met
> instead. BTW, non-canonical initiator codon is CUG, where did you found UUG?
This may clarify things:
>From the E. coli K-12 sequencing paper
(http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.277.5331.1453):
"The distribution of start codons is as follows: ATG, 3542; GTG, 612; and TTG,
130. There is also one ATT and possibly a CTG"
It's not that unusual an occurrence, and there are a small number of known
alternative start codons. 'Forcing' a Met start imposes the result that the
first codon is a methionine, rather than checking that the first codon *could
be* a methionine. I prefer the second behaviour.
L.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.open-bio.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
More information about the Biopython-dev
mailing list