[Bioperl-l] Proposal for bioperl-run

[Fields, Christopher J]

Actually, it might be better to have all the BLAST-related stuff as one distribution, unless we can get bioperl-run installing much more cleanly (little overhead with few dependencies).  Is that what you want to do?  If so: cool!

You should have commit to bioperl-run BTW, you are listed as part of the developer team.

chris

On Aug 22, 2014, at 7:09 AM, Mark A. Jensen <maj at fortinbras.us> wrote:

> Thanks Chris-- yes, you must be right. I just did a quick grep for "StandAloneBlast" in the modules. I will verify and leave bl2seq alone.
> Will do everything in branches and then give the signal-
> cheers MAJ
> On 2014-08-21 23:50, Fields, Christopher J wrote:
>> On Aug 21, 2014, at 9:37 PM, George Hartzell <hartzell at alerce.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> Mark A. Jensen writes:
>>>> [...]
>>>> My simple proposal is to move these three modules from bioperl-live to
>>>> bioperl-run. (Only AlignIO/bl2seq.pm depends on StandAloneBlast, btw).
>>>> 
>>>> Thoughts?
>>>> [...]
>>> 
>>> Speaking from a safe distance, that sounds *wonderful*.
>>> 
>>> g.
>> 
>> Agreed.  Also, I think you mean that StandAloneBlast has a dependency
>> on AlignIO::bl2seq, not the other way around, correct? At least, I
>> didn’t see anything there.
>> 
>> If no one objects to it (give it a day), I say go ahead and move it over.
>> 
>> chris
>