[Bioperl-l] Bug in Bio::Restriction::Analysis
Chris Fields
cjfields at illinois.edu
Thu Mar 3 22:57:57 UTC 2011
Forgot to add the summary, just for completeness. lots of errors like this that are halting tests:
------------- EXCEPTION -------------
MSG: Bad start parameter (0). Start must be positive.
STACK Bio::PrimarySeq::subseq /Users/cjfields/bioperl/bioperl-live/blib/lib/Bio/PrimarySeq.pm:400
STACK Bio::Restriction::Analysis::fragment_maps Bio/Restriction/Analysis.pm:556
STACK toplevel t/Restriction/Analysis-refac.t:143
-------------------------------------
Test Summary Report
-------------------
t/Restriction/Analysis-refac.t (Wstat: 65280 Tests: 26 Failed: 0)
Non-zero exit status: 255
Parse errors: Bad plan. You planned 91 tests but ran 26.
t/Restriction/Analysis.t (Wstat: 65280 Tests: 118 Failed: 0)
Non-zero exit status: 255
Parse errors: Bad plan. You planned 177 tests but ran 118.
t/Restriction/Gel.t (Wstat: 65280 Tests: 3 Failed: 0)
Non-zero exit status: 255
Parse errors: Bad plan. You planned 9 tests but ran 3.
Files=4, Tests=165, 29 wallclock secs ( 0.05 usr 0.03 sys + 3.44 cusr 0.21 csys = 3.73 CPU)
Result: FAIL
Failed 3/4 test programs. 0/165 subtests failed.
-c
On Mar 3, 2011, at 4:42 PM, Chris Fields wrote:
> Elia, Steve,
>
> Any tests we can add for this? I ran tests with the changes below and had several failing ones, but when only implementing the first fix ('unless (defined($cut_positions[0]))') all tests pass. Seems to be a coordinate issue (string-based positions are 0-based, bioperl coords are 1-based).
>
> chris
>
> On Mar 3, 2011, at 3:45 PM, Steve Chervitz wrote:
>
>> Good catch, Elia. Looks like an legitimate edge case. Your fix looks
>> reasonable to me, but I haven't tried running it through the regression
>> tests to see if it breaks anything else.
>>
>> Would be good to get this fix into the upcoming release.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Steve
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 8:50 AM, Elia Stupka <e.stupka at ucl.ac.uk> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Steve and Rob,
>>>
>>> it's been sometime since I last plunged my head into the code, but today we
>>> nailed a bug in Bio::Restriction::Analysis.
>>>
>>> Basically if a sequence has a restriction site which is exactly at the
>>> start of the sequence, it fails to produce any sites. The culprits is this
>>> line (536 of Analysis.pm)
>>>
>>> unless ($cut_positions[0]) {
>>>
>>> where if the position is zero, it will fail to execute the rest of the
>>> code, so I changed it to:
>>>
>>> unless (defined($cut_positions[0])) {
>>>
>>> Also, for similar reasons a bit further down this line:
>>>
>>> my $start=1; my $stop; my %seq; my %stop;
>>>
>>> needs to change to:
>>> my $start=0; my $stop; my %seq; my %stop;
>>>
>>> I didn't commit the changes because I wanted to check if it makes sense,
>>> etc.
>>>
>>> The bug seems reproducible also in older, stable versions of bioperl, such
>>> as 1.4 and 1.6...
>>>
>>> best
>>>
>>> Elia
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---
>>> Scientific Director - Bioinformatics, UCL Genomics
>>> Senior Lecturer, Bioinformatics
>>>
>>> UCL Cancer Institute
>>> Paul O' Gorman Building
>>> University College London
>>> 72, Huntley Street
>>> WC1E 6BT
>>> London
>>> UK
>>>
>>> Institute of Cell and Molecular Science
>>> Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry
>>> 4 Newark Street
>>> Whitechapel
>>> London
>>> E1 2AT
>>>
>>> Office (UCL): +44 207 679 6493
>>> Fax: +44 0207 6796817
>>> Office (ICMS): +44 0207 8822374
>>>
>>> Mobile: +44 787 6478912
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> --
>> Steve Chervitz, Ph.D.
>> Omicia Inc. | Senior Computational Biologist
>> 2200 Powell Street, Ste 525, Emeryville CA 94608
>> T 510-595-0800 | F 510-588-4523 | M 510-390-3613 | schervitz at omicia.com
>>
>> Omicia.com: Unlocking Individualized Medicine.
>> _______________________________________________
>> Bioperl-l mailing list
>> Bioperl-l at lists.open-bio.org
>> http://lists.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/bioperl-l
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bioperl-l mailing list
> Bioperl-l at lists.open-bio.org
> http://lists.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/bioperl-l
More information about the Bioperl-l
mailing list