[Bioperl-l] New Bioperl dependency? Sort::Naturally

Chris Fields cjfields at illinois.edu
Sun May 9 00:02:28 UTC 2010


Should clarify that: round-tripping to generate the same data structure/object is good and what we want.  Round-tripping to generate the exact same output is not our highest priority.

chris

On May 8, 2010, at 6:47 PM, Chris Fields wrote:

> To tell the truth, I'm more worried about getting data from various formats into Bio::* objects than getting the output 100% correct and identical to the original input.  None of the SeqIO module make that specific promise, simply b/c it's a nearly impossible thing to maintain, with very little payback.  Round-tripping is fine and all, just not our first priority.
> 
> chris
> 
> On May 8, 2010, at 6:34 AM, Florent Angly wrote:
> 
>> Same question about the CPAN module Test::Files (http://search.cpan.org/~philcrow/Test-Files-0.14/Files.pm <http://search.cpan.org/%7Ephilcrow/Test-Files-0.14/Files.pm>). I could see myself using it in the BioPerl unit tests to make sure that the assembly files written match the input assembly files.
>> 
>> It looks like the Bio::SeqIO modules tests could use it as well.
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> 
>> Florent
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Bioperl-l mailing list
>> Bioperl-l at lists.open-bio.org
>> http://lists.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/bioperl-l
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Bioperl-l mailing list
> Bioperl-l at lists.open-bio.org
> http://lists.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/bioperl-l





More information about the Bioperl-l mailing list