[Bioperl-l] Size of BioPerl distribution

[Mark A. Jensen]

Two of those files are my bad-- the withrefm is prob best in its entirety, since
it contains all the weird extra-site restrictions that the B:Restriction 
refactor
was meant to handle. The other is a tiling test file that I could probably 
replace
(or at least edit down)-- 
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Hilmar Lapp" <hlapp at gmx.net>
To: "Robert Buels" <rmb32 at cornell.edu>
Cc: "Chris Fields" <cjfields at illinois.edu>; "BioPerl List" 
<bioperl-l at lists.open-bio.org>
Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2009 6:33 PM
Subject: Re: [Bioperl-l] Size of BioPerl distribution


>
> On Sep 17, 2009, at 6:04 PM, Robert Buels wrote:
>
>> I don't think it's worth worrying about that much.  The stuff in  bioperl 
>> needs a significant amount of test data, and I think that's  fine.
>
>
> I'd agree with that. Storage is cheap these days. -hilmar
>
> -- 
> ===========================================================
> : Hilmar Lapp  -:-  Durham, NC  -:-  hlapp at gmx dot net :
> ===========================================================
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bioperl-l mailing list
> Bioperl-l at lists.open-bio.org
> http://lists.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/bioperl-l
>
>