[Bioperl-l] Size of BioPerl distribution

Robert Buels rmb32 at cornell.edu
Thu Sep 17 23:30:16 UTC 2009


Chris Fields wrote:
> Kind of my thought as well, just a bit of a shock to see the dist. 
> increase by 65% between point releases for just three test data files.  
> I may try paring those down a tad.

Yes, those individual files are certainly excessive.





More information about the Bioperl-l mailing list