[Bioperl-l] bioperl reorganization

[Mark A. Jensen]

Hi All,

After carefully reading this thread, weighing the pro and cons of the different 
positions, and searching out both the scientific and personal content of the 
reponses, I am compelled as a new core developer to say emphatically:

"So long, and thanks for all the fish."

No. I actually thought that a little analysis might tell us what BioPerl thinks 
its core is. So I invite you to check out
http://www.bioperl.org/wiki/Module_Connectivity
and come back swinging.

Cheers, MAJ

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Robert Buels" <rmb32 at cornell.edu>
To: "Mark Jensen" <maj.fortinbras at gmail.com>; "BioPerl List" 
<bioperl-l at lists.open-bio.org>
Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2009 9:05 PM
Subject: Re: [Bioperl-l] Tree refactor? was Re: Bootstrap, root, reroot...


> Rather than putting this in bioperl-dev, perhaps this would be a nice 
> opportunity to make a new distribution called something standard like 
> "Bio-Tree", with a standard directory structure, and a sane number of modules 
> in it.
...