[Bioperl-l] [moby] Re: bioperl-pipeline?

[Mark Wilkinson]

There are even more recent releases if you download directly from CPAN,  
and there are a half-dozen or more CVS commits today alone...

It's very much an active project!!

Mark



On Wed, 28 Jan 2009 13:42:09 -0800, Chris Fields <cjfields at illinois.edu>  
wrote:

> I see there is a Moby code release from Feb. 2008, so I'm assuming it's  
> very much 'alive' and happy (and still active).
>
> http://biomoby.org/PerlReleases/
>
> chris
>
> On Jan 28, 2009, at 3:42 PM, Mark Wilkinson wrote:
>
>> Biomoby is.... errr.... happy :-)
>>
>> ?  status in what respect ?
>>
>> M
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, 28 Jan 2009 13:23:00 -0800, Chris Fields <cjfields at illinois.edu 
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> Mark,
>>>
>>> I think the general idea was to know what the status of biomoby and  
>>> bioperl-pipeline was (not the two together).
>>>
>>> chris
>>>
>>> On Jan 28, 2009, at 3:19 PM, Mark Wilkinson wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hmmm... I can't tell what you want me to do here...  Are there  
>>>> biomoby components in bioperl-pipeline?  If so,can you tell me which  
>>>> services you need me to look at?
>>>>
>>>> M
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, 28 Jan 2009 10:33:11 -0800, Chris Fields  
>>>> <cjfields at illinois.edu> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Jan 28, 2009, at 12:17 PM, Hilmar Lapp wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> biopipe.org is dead. I don't know whether that extends then to  
>>>>>> bioperl-pipeline, but quite possibly so.
>>>>>
>>>>> My guess is yes, it is dead.
>>>>>
>>>>>> Biomoby is alive (if possibly in hibernation) AFAIAA. Maybe if we  
>>>>>> all collectively yell "Mark" he'll wake up and say something.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 	-hilmar
>>>>>
>>>>> MAARRRRRKKK!
>>>>>
>>>>> chris
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>