[Bioperl-l] Use of Root.pm versus RootI.pm

[Chris Fields]

I would say, according to BioPerl convention, it should be renamed  
WrapperBaseI.  It has a few interface-like methods and (importantly)  
lacks a constructor.  Unless someone else out there has other reasoning?

Note that this will require lots of bioperl-run changes as well, at  
least I think it will.

Chris

On Oct 13, 2006, at 3:56 AM, Sendu Bala wrote:

> Bio::Tools::Run::WrapperBase is currently a Bio::Root::RootI. It's
> certainly interface-like, but doesn't follow the normal interface  
> naming
> convention (WrapperBaseI). Should it be a Bio::Root::Root? Renamed
> WrapperBaseI? Left alone?
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bioperl-l mailing list
> Bioperl-l at lists.open-bio.org
> http://lists.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/bioperl-l

Christopher Fields
Postdoctoral Researcher
Lab of Dr. Robert Switzer
Dept of Biochemistry
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign