[Bioperl-l] StandAloneFasta::version
Sendu Bala
bix at sendu.me.uk
Tue Nov 7 12:49:09 EST 2006
Chris Fields wrote:
>> Well, how would you 'require' them to use anything at all? There's not
>> even anything 'requiring' that a core module inherit from
>> Bio::Root::Root(I). We just (very strongly) advise that you inherit from
>> there. So we can also advise that bioperl-run wrappers do not roll their
>> own but use Bio::Tools::Run::WrapperBase.
>
> Like I said, it's a suggestion. No need to get snippy.
You took that completely the wrong way. I am applying absolutely no
value judgment on your suggestion. It may be an excellent one. I was
simply explaining we have no programmatic way of requiring that modules
use other modules - we rely on people following the advice/ status quo.
Given that, are you still suggesting that it would be better to advise
people to use Bio::Root::SomeNewRunThing, or is
Bio::Tools::Run::WrapperBase satisfactory?
More information about the Bioperl-l
mailing list