[Bioperl-l] Bio::*Taxonomy* changes
Hilmar Lapp
hlapp at gmx.net
Tue Jul 25 19:18:00 UTC 2006
On Jul 25, 2006, at 2:24 PM, Chris Fields wrote:
> Once this is all done, will we really have a need for Bio::Species?
No, except for backwards compatibility. Phasing it out will go over a
couple of releases. E.g., v1.6.x could have deprecation warning in
the documentation. v1.7+ would have deprecation warnings in the code
written to stderr.
Just as an aside, we can't just drastically change the return type of
a method. Instead, if at all possible, there should be a new method
so that the old can be phased out over time but otherwise not
changed. I.e., don't change $seq->species() to now all of a sudden
return a node or taxonomic lineage, even if initially Bio::Species is
returned with some magic under the hood. Instead, create something like
# return a Bio::Taxonomy::Node:
my $taxon = $seq->taxon();
# alternative approach: return a lineage (taxonomy)
# this would be Bio::TaxonomyI compliant
my $lineage = $seq->lineage();
The former would require the lineage (and organelle for completeness)
information to be either easily (though not necessarily directly)
accessible through the node, or added as annotation.
-hilmar
--
===========================================================
: Hilmar Lapp -:- Durham, NC -:- hlapp at gmx dot net :
===========================================================
More information about the Bioperl-l
mailing list