[Bioperl-l] Bio::Species/Bio::Taxonomy changes
Chris Fields
cjfields at uiuc.edu
Mon Jul 24 19:34:55 UTC 2006
> > Maybe the file parser could have its own organelle() method
> > and leave all taxonomic classes without such a method. Or it could
> > stay
> > as is, I don't know.
>
> Like I said above, at the end of the day there needs to be a way to
> qualify a sequence by the genome it is part of.
Agreed. I think Sendu's right in one regard, it doesn't seem to have
anything to do with the taxonomy itself. See below...
There should be a way of containing this somehow, maybe using a
Bio::Annotation::SimpleValue object or having a get/set somehow.
> > Do different organelles in the same species get unique taxonomy ids?
>
> I would have to confirm, but I believe so. As I said, from a genome/
> sequence-centric viewpoint, the organelle and nuclear genomes are two
> different things.
Looks like the organelle sequence data uses the organism TaxID. I couldn't
find organelle-specific taxon information using the TaxBrowser for
mitochondrion, chloroplast, or plastid.
source 1..426
/organism="Reticulitermes tibialis"
/organelle="mitochondrion"
/mol_type="genomic DNA"
/db_xref="taxon:186107"
/haplotype="T9"
TaxID refers to the organism ("Reticulitermes tibialis"), not the
mitochondrion.
source 1..814
/organism="Porterinema fluviatile"
/organelle="plastid:chloroplast"
/mol_type="genomic DNA"
/strain="SAG 124.79"
/db_xref="taxon:246123"
/country="Germany"
TaxID refers to the organism ("Porterinema fluviatile"), not the
chloroplast.
Chris
More information about the Bioperl-l
mailing list