[Bioperl-l] Bio::*Taxonomy* changes

[Sendu Bala]

Hilmar Lapp wrote:
>
> So overall I think you should just go ahead.

One last suggestion for discussion:

It may be appropriate is to rename Bio::Taxonomy::Node to clarify that 
Node has no particular reliance on or association with Bio::Taxonomy or 
the other modules in Bio/Taxonomy/.

How about calling it Bio::Taxon?

It is more obvious what to expect from something called 'Bio::Taxon' 
when you know that it is the new 'Bio::Species': like Bio::Species but 
for any taxon. It also makes the class 'top-level' which I think most 
people are happier using; seems like things in sub-directories are more 
for advanced users.