[Biojava-l] SAX, DOM, XPath and Flat files
Andy Yates
ayates at ebi.ac.uk
Wed Nov 28 15:37:03 UTC 2007
Hi Dmitry,
StAX still has higher memory consumption than SAX (still not as large as
DOM) but yes it is quite a good parser system & since we're moving
towards the later versions of Java may be a good idea to use it as our
standard parser ... if it supports XPath (can't remember off the top of
my head) :)
Andy
Dmitry Repchevsky wrote:
> Hello!
>
> Actually there is also a StAX parser (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/StAX)
> which is faster when SAX and allows writing.
> In JDK 6 apart of StAX there is JAXB which is a perfect combination to
> parse a huge files.
> You can go through the XML fie using StAX until the element you are
> interested in and unmarshall it using JAXB to POJO object.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Dmitry
> _______________________________________________
> Biojava-l mailing list - Biojava-l at lists.open-bio.org
> http://lists.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/biojava-l
More information about the Biojava-l
mailing list