[Biojava-l] yes, something like this

[Matthew Pocock]

Agreed - biojava and UML don't like each other. UML seems much more 
suited to data-blob designs where as biojava is mainly a relationships 
and associations design. The OWL for biojava looks ok though. Hey ho.

mark.schreiber at group.novartis.com wrote:

>Unfortunately the heavy use of interfaces and 'mutliple inheritance' in 
>biojava means that those UML diagrams are about as simple as you will get. 
>I suppose they could be pruned a bit to show only interfaces implemted and 
>classes extended and not dependencies and reverse dependencies.
>
>- Mark
>
>
>
>
>
>Magic Fang <fangl at genomics.org.cn>
>Sent by: biojava-l-bounces at portal.open-bio.org
>03/19/2004 02:37 PM
>
> 
>        To:     Mark Schreiber/GP/Novartis at PH
>        cc:     biojava-l at biojava.org
>        Subject:        [Biojava-l] yes, something like this
>
>
>this one seems too detail and complex, i mean just class function and 
>inherit relationship.
>_______________________________________________
>Biojava-l mailing list  -  Biojava-l at biojava.org
>http://biojava.org/mailman/listinfo/biojava-l
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Biojava-l mailing list  -  Biojava-l at biojava.org
>http://biojava.org/mailman/listinfo/biojava-l
>
>  
>