[Biojava-dev] RE: [Biojava-l] JVM level for BioJava - should we migrate to 1.4 as our base JVM?

Matthew Pocock matthew_pocock at yahoo.co.uk
Wed Mar 19 10:02:14 EST 2003

Previous message: [Biojava-l] JVM level for BioJava - should we migrate to 1.4 as our base JVM?
Next message: [Biojava-l] biojava1.3pre2 Plans
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

I'm happy with that. Who wants to be 'merging tzar'?

Matthew

Schreiber, Mark wrote:
> How about we roll out a biojava1.3pre2 which has a combined code base
> and if it blows chunks we can migrate back again?
> 
> - Mark

Previous message: [Biojava-l] JVM level for BioJava - should we migrate to 1.4 as our base JVM?
Next message: [Biojava-l] biojava1.3pre2 Plans
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

More information about the Biojava-l mailing list