[Biojava-l] FramedFeature interface

[Emig, Robin]

You do realize that many of the other classes in biojava are 1 based rather
than 0 based. Lets keep one standard, I don't care which. Having some
functions 1 based and some 0 based will drive many insane, in fact I've
already lost a developer to the current standard being 1 based :).
-Robin

-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Schreiber [mailto:mark_s@sanger.otago.ac.nz]
Sent: Monday, September 03, 2001 2:45 PM
To: Hilmar Lapp
Cc: Schreiber, Mark; biojava-l (E-mail)
Subject: Re: [Biojava-l] FramedFeature interface


I agree, 0..2 is more in keeping with other bioinformatics standards.


On Mon, 3 Sep 2001, Hilmar Lapp wrote:

> 
> --- "Schreiber, Mark" <mark.schreiber@agresearch.co.nz> wrote:
> > Hi -
> > 
> > Below is a work up for a possible FramedFeature interface
> > 
> > Any comments?
> > 
> Just a note for the integer codes: Bioperl as well as many other
> bioinformatics applications use frames [+/-]0..2 instead of 1..3.
> 
>    -hilmar
> 
> =====
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> Hilmar Lapp                         email: lapp@gnf.org
> GNF, San Diego, Ca. 92121           phone: +1-858-812-1757
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Get email alerts & NEW webcam video instant messaging with Yahoo!
Messenger
> http://im.yahoo.com
> _______________________________________________
> Biojava-l mailing list  -  Biojava-l@biojava.org
> http://biojava.org/mailman/listinfo/biojava-l
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Mark Schreiber			Ph: 64 3 4797875
Rm 218				email mark_s@sanger.otago.ac.nz
Department of Biochemistry	email m.schreiber@clear.net.nz
University of Otago		
PO Box 56
Dunedin
New Zealand
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

_______________________________________________
Biojava-l mailing list  -  Biojava-l@biojava.org
http://biojava.org/mailman/listinfo/biojava-l