[Biojava-l] biojava-corba build failing

[Matthew Pocock]

Hi Jason,

The biojava-biocorba package should be tagged with a 0.1 tag. After 
that, we can make it work with the current code-base and IDL. I take it 
from your message that you are keen to do *some* of the coding for this. 
I can help out a bit, but I am realy doing DAS related stuff at the 
moment. Anybody else interested? I realy like the idea of 
ensembl->bioperl->biocorba->biojava. Equaly, we can go 
ensembl->biojava->biocorba->bioperl (take a look at the two ensembl 
packages).

Matthew

Jason Stajich wrote:

> build is failing now because some interfaces have been extended and the
> classes don't implement some of the new methods.  More importantly though
> it looks like you are still using the old biocorba (v0.01) idl but we have
> had a new idl for about 2 months (v0.02).  I'm happy to help here, I think
> that Matthew did most of this earlier so I'd like for things to be
> consistent.
> 
> biocorba idl is in cvs repository on bioperl.org /home/repository/bioperl
> bioperl-corba-server/biocorba.idl
> or
> /home/repository/biocorba
> biocorba-idls/biocorba.idl
> (except this does not seem to be allowing anonymous access at this time)
> 
> I'd really like to be able to write some java bindings to the ensembl
> corba interface as a proof that we can make a complete loop here.
> 
> Anyone interested in helping?  Getting the biojava-corba up to
> biocorba-0.2 spec is a bug part of this!
> 
> Jason Stajich
> jason@chg.mc.duke.edu
> Center for Human Genetics
> Duke University Medical Center
> http://www.chg.duke.edu/
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Biojava-l mailing list  -  Biojava-l@biojava.org
> http://biojava.org/mailman/listinfo/biojava-l