[Biojava-l] thats was my mistake at modifying..the xml parsar

[Sarath]

hi 
  I am sorry and that was my mistake in modifying the xml parsar and
not setting the class path back ..so now the problem is solved 
sarath

On Tue, 12 Jun 2001, Thomas Down wrote:

> Sarath's right.  This issue probably /IS/ more Genbank's
> fault than ours, but realistically the BioJava parser is
> being far too strict.  Especially since it doesn't validate
> for the presence of other header entries -- just GI.
> 
> I've added an extra conditional in the code, and it now
> tolerates VERSION lines which just contain a single token.
> 
> Sarath: this is checked into CVS now -- do you have access
> to the CVS versions?
> 
> 
>    Thomas.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 01:37:23PM +0200, Sarath wrote:
> > Hi keith 
> >   I would have accepted your point very well if the files found at
> > 
> >    ftp://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genomes/Bacteria/Staphylococcus_aureus/
> > 
> >  read the sequences as these are supposed to contain the actual gene bank
> > formatas per the README you have refered to but neverthless they failed
> > and the README at this url below
> >    ftp://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genomes/Bacteria/
> > says even the so called better versions have the same sequences
> > 
> >   "At present only Archaeoglobus fulgidus genomes is considered
> > "reviewed", other genomes are presented as found in the source GenBank
> > records "
>