[Biojava-l] Possible minor change before 1.0
Thomas Down
td2@sanger.ac.uk
Fri, 30 Jun 2000 17:39:13 +0100
On Fri, Jun 30, 2000 at 05:53:04PM +0100, Simon Brocklehurst wrote:
>
> Any reason not to simply deprecate nextSequence() and add next() ?
>
> One of the advantages of Java for developing apis is that you don't
> actually have to keep breaking code, especially for this kind of
> "tidying up" of method names.
That's an alternative option. I'm just slightly reluctant since
a) This is an interface, which potentially quite a lot of
people will eventually want to implement.
b) We're still pre-1.0. I'd quite like to see 1.0 land up with
a set of core interfaces which are as cruft-free as possible,
and those can then serve as a baseline for future evolution
(with maximum effort made towards compatibility).
But I'll go the deprecation route if enough people are already
relying heavily on this interface.
Thomas.
--
He looked up with big brown eyes. ``They're really only
tiny little A-bombs, honest.''
-- David Brin.