[Biojava-l] nasty stuff
Jared Nedzel
nedzel@mpi.com
Fri, 18 Feb 2000 10:38:34 -0500
Matthew:
I am unable to get to the CVS repository at the moment.
Could you send me a copy a file header with the license?
If the code uses the Gnu Public License, then we probably
can't use it. Here's the problem. Millennium as a corporation
does not "sell" software. However, we have large
partnerships ($100M USD+) with pharmaceutical corporations.
They give us a pile of money. In return, we give them research
results (e.g., drug targets). One of the things that
they get for their pile of money is access to our technology.
That includes our software. So, while Millennium does not
"sell" software in the common sense, it could be interpreted
in the strict sense that, in fact, we do. I can't imagine
us every "selling" a Blast parser -- we're in the drug
business, not the software business. But we do analyze
blast results and do need to integrate that function into
some of our programs, and we do distribute some of those
programs to our collaborators.
Under the Gnu Public License, if we integrate GPL software
with our code, then we might have to make all our software
open source. Consequently, the suits prohibit us from using
some (most?) GPL software.
The Perl artistic license is something our suits can
live with. The Perl artistic license basically says that
if you make any changes to the underlying code, you need
to provide those changes to the community. And if you
distribute it, you need to distribute the standard
version and not call it your own.
Here's the Perl artistic license, which you can get from
http://www.perl.com. Sorry about the formatting.
Jared
-------------------------
The "Artistic License"
Preamble
The intent of this document is to state the conditions under which a
Package may be copied, such that the Copyright Holder maintains some
semblance of artistic
control over the development of the package, while giving the users of
the package the right to use and distribute the Package in a
more-or-less customary fashion,
plus the right to make reasonable modifications.
Definitions
"Package" refers to the collection of files distributed by
the Copyright Holder, and derivatives of that collection of
files created through textual modification.
"Standard Version" refers to such a Package if it has not been
modified, or has been modified in accordance with the wishes of
the Copyright Holder as specified below.
"Copyright Holder" is whoever is named in the copyright or
copyrights for the package.
"You" is you, if you're thinking about copying or distributing
this Package.
"Reasonable copying fee" is whatever you can justify on the basis
of media cost, duplication charges, time of people involved, and
so on. (You will not be required to justify it to the Copyright
Holder, but only to the computing community at large as a market
that must bear the fee.)
"Freely Available" means that no fee is charged for the item
itself,
though there may be fees involved in handling the item. It also
means that recipients of the item may redistribute it under the
same conditions they received it.
1.You may make and give away verbatim copies of the source form of
the Standard Version of this Package without restriction, provided
that you duplicate all of the original copyright notices and
associated disclaimers.
2.You may apply bug fixes, portability fixes and other modifications
derived from the Public Domain or from the Copyright Holder. A
Package modified in such a way shall still be considered the
Standard Version.
3.You may otherwise modify your copy of this Package in any way,
provided that you insert a prominent notice in each changed file
stating how and when you changed that file, and provided that you
do at least ONE of the following:
a.place your modifications in the Public Domain or otherwise
make them Freely Available, such as by posting said
modifications
to Usenet or an equivalent medium, or placing the
modifications
on a major archive site such as uunet.uu.net, or by allowing
the
Copyright Holder to include your modifications in the Standard
Version of the Package.
b.use the modified Package only within your corporation or
organization.
c.rename any non-standard executables so the names do not
conflict
with standard executables, which must also be provided, and
provide
a separate manual page for each non-standard executable that
clearly documents how it differs from the Standard Version.
d.make other distribution arrangements with the Copyright
Holder.
4.You may distribute the programs of this Package in object code or
executable form, provided that you do at least ONE of the
following:
a.distribute a Standard Version of the executables and library
files,
together with instructions (in the manual page or equivalent)
on
where to get the Standard Version.
b.accompany the distribution with the machine-readable source of
the
Package with your modifications.
c.give non-standard executables non-standard names, and clearly
document the differences in manual pages (or equivalent),
together with instructions on where to get the Standard
Version.
d.make other distribution arrangements with the Copyright
Holder.
5.You may charge a reasonable copying fee for any distribution of
this
Package. You may charge any fee you choose for support of this
Package.
You may not charge a fee for this Package itself. However, you may
distribute this Package in aggregate with other (possibly
commercial)
programs as part of a larger (possibly commercial) software
distribution
provided that you do not advertise this Package as a product of
your own.
You may embed this Package's interpreter within an executable of
yours
(by linking); this shall be construed as a mere form of
aggregation,
provided that the complete Standard Version of the interpreter is
so embedded.
6.The scripts and library files supplied as input to or produced as
output
from the programs of this Package do not automatically fall under
the
copyright of this Package, but belong to whomever generated them,
and
may be sold commercially, and may be aggregated with this Package.
If
such scripts or library files are aggregated with this Package via
the
so-called "undump" or "unexec" methods of producing a binary
executable
image, then distribution of such an image shall neither be
construed as a
distribution of this Package nor shall it fall under the
restrictions of
Paragraphs 3 and 4, provided that you do not represent such an
executable
image as a Standard Version of this Package.
7.C subroutines (or comparably compiled subroutines in other
languages)
supplied by you and linked into this Package in order to emulate
subroutines and variables of the language defined by this Package
shall not be considered part of this Package, but are the
equivalent
of input as in Paragraph 6, provided these subroutines do not
change
the language in any way that would cause it to fail the regression
tests for the language.
8.Aggregation of this Package with a commercial distribution is
always
permitted provided that the use of this Package is embedded; that
is,
when no overt attempt is made to make this Package's interfaces
visible
to the end user of the commercial distribution. Such use shall not
be
construed as a distribution of this Package.
9.The name of the Copyright Holder may not be used to endorse or
promote
products derived from this software without specific prior written
permission.
10.THIS PACKAGE IS PROVIDED "AS IS" AND WITHOUT ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED
WARRANTIES,
INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF
MERCHANTIBILITY
AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Matthew Pocock wrote:
>
> Hi.
>
> We are currently LGPL. Does this cause you problems? We basicaly want
> something that protects us from having the code appropreated by a third
> party, but allows anybody to use it free of charge. I don't realy
> understand licensing (does anybody else out there?), but LGPL seemed
> closest. There should be a header on each file that states this license
> agreement.
>
> I hope this helps.
>
> Matthew
>
> Jared Nedzel wrote:
>
> > Sorry to have to ask this, but I have to keep the
> > suits happy...
> >
> > What are the license issues regarding the Biojava
> > code? Can someone tell me where I can find a
> > copy of the license wording?
> >
> > If it is being released under GPL, that will send
> > our suits running screaming from the room and prevent
> > me from using it.
> >
> > If Biojava is being released under something akin to
> > the Perl Artistic License, then that is something we
> > can deal with.
> >
> > Jared
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Biojava-l mailing list - Biojava-l@biojava.org
> > http://biojava.org/mailman/listinfo/biojava-l
>
> _______________________________________________
> Biojava-l mailing list - Biojava-l@biojava.org
> http://biojava.org/mailman/listinfo/biojava-l